Hollywood vs The Novel

Can you list any books made into movies that Hollywood hasn’t hacked apart?

Anyone who is a serious reader can form a long list of movies that Hollywood utterly failed in their execution. That list is easy to make.

Here are three books I think Hollywood managed to do well:

  • Fight Club – Chuck Palahniuk
  • Game of Thrones – George R. R. Martin
  • The Hunger Games – Suzanne Collins

Even still, it’s easy to pick out places where Hollywood deviated from the book.

Is it fair to include Game of Thrones in the list? Granted, HBO is outside the normal distribution channels utilized by Hollywood. They did manage to follow Martin’s novels pretty closely so far. Of course, the opposite side of that coin is True Blood, which veers all over the novels from what I’m told.

If failure to match up to the book is the norm, why are we consistently taken by surprise when the movie in no way resembles the book except for the character names? Do we maintain too high expectations of Hollywood and their mass produced feature films? Perhaps we should simply consider the author’s work as canon and the movie as an Alternate Universe?

Advertisements

Author: Joshua

Joshua is a writer of SFF, leaning more to the fantasy side of the genre. Travel the road with me as I tell the stories.

3 thoughts on “Hollywood vs The Novel”

  1. I think the time period was one of many factors that make the film so great. Everything came together just right for this film.

Tell me what you think

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s